lovely diacritic?

Tribute to Mediacorp Channel 8
20 June, 2009, 1:57 am
Filed under: Film, Music, Uncategorized | Tags:

These are my favourite theme songs from channel 8 dramas that were shown over the past 20 years.

guan huai fang shi

zhao an lao shi (Good Morning, Sir) (1989)

dou fu jie (Tofu Street) (1996)

ke jia zhi ge (The Guest People) (1997)

gei lang gei lang (Living in Geylang) (1998)

wei si li (The New Adventures of Wisely) (1998)

bo yin ren (Right Frequency) (1999)

chu lu (Stepping Out) (1999)

fu man ren jian (Wok of Life) (1999)

liu xing hua yuan (Meteor Garden) (2001)

xing meng qing zhen (Fantasy) (2002)

bu fan de ai (By My Side) (2008)

xiao niang re (The Little Nyonya) (2008)


And I thought the basketball tricks on 17 Again were fake.
9 May, 2009, 12:44 am
Filed under: Entertainment, Film | Tags: , ,

I was watching The Ellen DeGeneres Show the other day and I could not help but to video Zac Efron doing all these stunts despite knowing how bad the quality will turn out. So pardon the poor quality, and be impressed as I am when you see Efron do a spin on his pinky finger.



This is the basketball trick from 17 Again that I could not believe intially. It is also my most favourite scene in the movie. Even though it seems like they are just tricks, each movement actually paints the picture of the word that he says. Pretty cool eh?

What sheepherders can do:
28 March, 2009, 12:28 am
Filed under: Animals, Animation, Film, Technology | Tags:

Imma Shine
21 March, 2009, 12:25 am
Filed under: Film, Music | Tags: ,

Remember “Imma Shine” from the movie “Step Up”?

Step Up – Imma Shine

I just found out it may have been derived from a baroque music – Marcello’s Oboe Concerto in D minor! Was tuning in to 92.4FM in the car this afternoon and the violin motive sounded so similar! What a beautiful melody to reuse and translate into a hip-hop music.

Marcello – Oboe Concerto in D minor

What makes a movie great like “The Curious Case of Benjamin Button”
17 February, 2009, 1:40 am
Filed under: Film | Tags:

It has been a long time since I caught such a good movie. I am so going to buy the DVD. Anyway, what makes a movie great like “The Curious Case of Benjamin Button”?


Reoccurences of Themes

I totally love having this characteristic in a film. There were so many instances when previously introduced ideas were brought back, giving a sense of unity in the film. One being the most prominent was this old man from the home, who was slightly senile, told Benjamin Button “I got struck by lightning seven times”. This immediately followed with a re-enactment of the accident. Altogether I THINK this scene appeared a total of seven times? I am not too sure, I did not count.

Another idea was to have the camera zooming onto Benjamin’s pair of feet. I think it represents determination in him. It first appeared when Benjamin was trying to stand up to walk after the Priest prayed a healing over him and then appeared when Benjamin was determined to find Daisy while she was going to meet with an accident. I am sure there were other reoccurence that I have yet to discover after only a single watching.


Convincing Background

I think the most difficult background to shoot with would be sunrise or sunset. It is a background that is constantly changing and any delays will just affect the flow. I was very satistifed with this film’s sunrise scene when it looked so convincing. Like the sun did not move a single bit. This was unlike “The Wedding Game”, when the sun moved so significantly and the sky lit so much brighter. Either Brad Pitt and Jason Flemyng had little or no NGs or David Fincher is a perfectionist and wanted to film during the next sunrise assuming too many delays were made.


Use of Factual Content

The film inserted Pearl Harbour’s history into it, featuring Benjamin participating in the war and being one of the survivors. Having such an important history in the film allowed easier identification for audience with the film. This also adds depth in the storyline which convinces people that there might really be a man who aged backwards and survived the Pearl Harbour attack.

The portrayal of the changes in culture over time was also accurate. Such as moving from the 40s Broadway influence with huge gramophone used as props to Brad Pitt riding on a motorbike wearing 60s kind of shades and clothes. Surely made the film more realistic.


Reversed Unfolding of Plot

Usually when a trouble in a film happens, it is followed by regrets expressed by the character. However, in this film it was the opposite. Benjamin expressed regrets and the “if only”s before Daisy met with the accident. This keeps audience in suspense, totally clueless that a misfortune is about to happen on the talented and successful dancer. Audience will then be able to sense the same anguish as Daisy feels when the accident happens. Such tugging of audience’s heart is a useful way of getting audience to be involved in the film, thus causing us audience to think it is a good film.


A Tinge of Humour

Allowing audiences to laugh prevents the film from falling into monotony. In this film, there were a couple of scenes that triggered laughters. One was when Benjamin was growing up going through puberty, with his old, wrinkled face, he flex his new developed muscles in the mirror with full of confidence. Another scene was when Benjamin was left to play with himself. He would take his little army soldiers and play like just any other boys would, making shooting sounds. This was funny as his face was the old and wrinkled one,  and it is funny to see an old-faced Benjamin doing such a kiddy thing. There were many more other humourous scenes too that really add flavour to the film. There were certainly not lame ones that would just turn people off.


Background music

I believe having an appropriate background music is important. It assists the execution of the mood. If done inappropriately, no matter how the backdrop is nicely plotted, the precise mood that is supposed to be expressed will not deliver. In this case, I think Alexandra Desplat did a great job for the film. 


So far these are the few characteristics that went through my mind during the film that I can recall. Man, I can’t wait for another movie to be as fantastic as this. The 3 hours was surely worthwhile.

Food Fight
9 September, 2008, 4:59 pm
Filed under: Film, Food | Tags: , ,

The Dark Knight
3 September, 2008, 12:46 am
Filed under: Entertainment, Film, Religion | Tags: , , ,


This show really sets one thinking about the root of human behaviour and reaction to situations. Batman wondered why Joker could not stop creating chaos in the city. Alfred answered that the root of his behaviour was simply his interest in dynamite and explosion. In another scene of the three ships having to make a life-and-death decision, whether to blow up the other boats in order to survive by being the last one standing, creates a suspense which is similar to watching “Saw”. This scene sets you thinking about the final decision each boat would make and why did they not choose the other.


Another thing on my mind surfaced from Harvey’s transition to Two-Face. Initially Harvey was a respectable man in the city. Picture this as a man being a strong believer of Christ. But when situation happens (like the death of Rachel, woman of Harvey’s life), the devil will wait for the right opportunity to pounce upon that wound and bring you down. (Joker got Harvey’s support for the destructive doings by emphasing on the unjust death of his girlfriend. This changed his way of thinking and his actions.) Subsequently, actions committed may seem logical to the person but in biblical perspective, it is actually wrong. (Similarly, Harvey’s mind was badly influenced by the Joker that revenge was the most logical thing for him to do to counter the problem. Obviously from a third party perspective, revenge is not the best solution to handle death, in fact, it worsens the situation.) If only the situation was handled with the right biblical measures, the problem will surely be overcome. (If only Harvey did not give in to Joker’s persuasions, he would not have taken the path of revenge that eventually cost him his life.)